For CTOs, heads of security, infrastructure leads and CISOs
Know your exposure before anyone asks
When the next critical CVE is discovered, bifrost already knows how well protected you are, where you have it, and what to do about the rest. The answer comes from workloads hardened before the CVE existed: every one of them running under its own profile, enforced at the kernel.
What you're up against
A critical CVE is in the news and the first question is "do we have it?" Answering it takes a war room: a fresh scan, a hunt through every environment, a day of engineering time. The question that would actually close the room, "are we protected?", usually gets no answer at all. Meanwhile the scanner backlog keeps growing, most of it findings nothing can reach, and there is no credible way to show the board that the security spend is working.
New to bifrost? See how it works in four steps.
Up to 90%
Fewer CVEs to triage
<1%
CPU overhead in production
<10 min
From Helm install to the first profile
What changes with bifrost
bifrost starts from runtime and works up: it learns every workload, prioritises every CVE against that knowledge, protects each workload with its own profile, and answers the next CVE from what it already knows. This is what each step gives the person accountable for the outcome.
The war room becomes a lookup
When the next CVE is discovered, bifrost checks it against every environment from what it already knows. No new build, no new scan. The answer arrives in the order the room needs it: protected or not, where you have it, and the remedies for the rest.
Every workload, down to what it does
One label and one annotation, and every build is observed before production: which environment it runs in and how it is configured, what it contains, which CVEs it carries, and the syscalls, files and connections it uses doing its job.
Hardened before the CVE drops
Every production workload gets its own security profile, generated from its learned behaviour and enforced at the kernel. Default-deny at the strongest setting: anything outside the profile is blocked, including exploits nobody has discovered yet. Under 1% CPU overhead.
Reachable CVEs, and only those
Every CVE gets a verdict against what actually runs: reachable, mitigated by the profile, or never loaded. bifrost does the triage, and what reaches your team arrives with the evidence behind its verdict.
Board-ready metrics
Attack surface reduction, reachable CVEs opened and closed, and enforcement coverage across production: numbers read off runtime data, not estimated, that you can restate to a board without caveats.
Evidence that maps to your frameworks
Continuous enforcement produces continuous evidence: profiles, violation logs, SBOM histories and CVE timelines that map to the requirements in SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, NIS2, DORA and the Cyber Resilience Act.
What you can show
When the board asks "are we protected?" and the auditor asks "how do you manage vulnerability risk?", the same picture answers both. Continuous enforcement produces continuous evidence.
Protection you can point to
Every production workload runs under its own profile, enforced by the kernel, with a record of every deployment and every blocked action. Not a periodic scan that says what was true once: enforcement that is on, and the evidence that it was.
A prioritisation you can defend
"Every CVE is verdicted against how the workload actually runs, and we remediate the reachable ones first." A stronger statement than "we patch the high CVSS scores", and every verdict carries the evidence behind it.
A shrinking attack surface
Attack surface reduction and enforcement coverage, trended quarter by quarter from runtime data. Proof that the security investment is working, in numbers you did not have to estimate.
Evidence that maps to your frameworks
Profiles, violation logs, SBOM histories and CVE timelines, exported against the requirements in SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, NIS2, DORA and the Cyber Resilience Act.
Executive use cases
Three questions the accountable executive gets asked, and what bifrost answers them with.
The headline CVE
Answered from a screen, in the order the room needs it, from what bifrost already knows.
Board-level reporting
Prevention you can show rather than assert, from runtime data rather than estimates.
A new vendor at the kernel
Assess bifrost the way you would assess anything that runs on every node: by how it deploys and how it ramps.
A lookup, not a war room
The next CVE, answered from what bifrost already knows. See it on your stack: a 30-minute demo, or 14 days on your own cluster.